Many terms are used to describe these approaches, including real time evaluations, rapid feedback evaluation, rapid evaluation methods, rapid-cycle evaluation and rapid appraisal. Be the first to comment on this page! There are currently no comments. 375 0 obj <>stream Various ways of doing evaluation in ways that support democratic decision making, accountability and/or capacity. 0 DFID’s Approach to Value for Money (VfM) This guide from the UK Department for International Development (DFID) sets out the principles that are used to ensure value for money in DFID development programmes. DFID has listened to feedback from CSOs and are reorganising the templates to link costs to activities and intended outcomes. Staff show a keen awareness of DFID’s commitment to value for money and their own responsibility for ensuring it. VfM is an evaluative question about how well resources are used, and whether the resource use is justified (King, 2017). CRIDF VfM GN v1 Page 1 of 13 Part I: Value for Money (VfM) in DFID Programming Goal (of the VfM Strategy): Improve CRIDF’s VFM with a focus on greater results while minimising the use of available resources and for CRIDF to be transparent and accountable with improved Improving aid accountability is essential for the survival of the sector. Develop programme theory/theory of change, 5. Define ethical and quality evaluation standards, 6. �wQyK�l� �"��>z׭-�\c�>CRw˛�f��\R�Ϝ93z�-^��;��j�*�(0�6Ɓ����!�P�~�2�k�B���Jd�s�q3�q^�y�8����f"��� ]`�)IM�x��AJ��7ﲅ�hJ�Blj4᫴��xM����b�Gw�Dwk\���-����TB���V�s�B'�WG6]P�ѷ�FLCv��)�-AIݸ��z���W��p(���=�|\�6E �En�&����YN|�^�wǏ\�]{읝�ŋ�K1�4�Cpn|~�/&��+cH"ko}l^�Y�4k(���(7��C`��W%��r��ci��cZ�P��B;`������6,+{X���浧����e���E�����cw���E�"�V8!�$C�����ݾ�e� bN�J�?E��e���%cp�,��>,N� ʤ78'� #��D�u�'P���|s83ѡ�G\�Y ��M��3����%��J����1���J2p.��q�Yq�w��vh{�1�� 7�mU��wbR�mCd�� �>7��LvPpE���I�ܜ� +���)(B�*=#�sB>q�0�|&L��T�/�6�9(G�n�9Pu�N�/@O���z���x��w��{=�r�'��@=(oi �v�uL��z�H���W�zoOE��~��@(�G����|�}�b�M���p�?���I|lBߟ��,ؼr�t�x�v7�r�P[[����������QHQ�i�|��]Kx� ��t/M!ҁR�v�gL��#��˘S�Hd&% uV�����n�vO�����7[wu����o��=��̷ DfID’s overseas offices should “articulate cross-cutting value for money objectives at the country portfolio level”, where the review found management issues. Value for money has been “thoroughly integrated into programme management” at DFID, and staff have taken responsibility for ensuring they are getting maximum value from our programmes. jbX�Ds�>�J��vQ�f�.׉V��=�o`z�[��jD븉�j2*�����r��'���k[u��?CQW��(!�Q�ڜ ���|�ӣ�a8�l��Xә�)B�5� /V��.����f�E=�\". A particular type of case study used  to create a narrative of how institutional arrangements have evolved over time and have created and contributed to more effective ways to achieve project or program goals. 1 Adapted from Department for International Development of the United Kingdom (DFID)’s Approach to Value for Money (2017). Combining qualitative and quantitative data, 1. An participatory approach to value-for-money evaluation that identifies a broad range of social outcomes, not only the direct outcomes for the intended beneficiaries of an intervention. h�b```�BF6^�e`B��z��-g��̑|��8-����I-�}+X�n�[��7�>"�Z��ֿ0�o�_���u��m``�h� ����%0� D2p D��i �5��> if � �/����I��3O =� �00�q�(2�����4�s=@l��hp�g�0 HG The An impact evaluation approach which unpacks  an initiative’s theory of change, provides a framework to collect data on immediate, basic changes that lead to longer, more transformative change, and allows for the plausible assessment of the initiative’s contribution to results via ‘boundary partners’. It includes two frameworks: the first highlights the principles used by DFID to ensure value for money; the second focuses on results and value for money. Synthesise data from a single evaluation, How we ensure Value for Money in our Aid Programme 9. An impact evaluation approach that iteratively maps available evidence against a theory of change, then identifies and addresses challenges to causal inference. Drawing on its experience with introducing adaptive programming, DFID should encourage programmes to experiment with different ways of delivering results more cost-effectively, particularly for more complex programming. 6/03/2003. Justine Greening: Delivering better performance and better value for money in development Speech by the Development Secretary at DFID's third annual supplier conference, held at … Tweets by @BetterEval !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)? Investigate possible alternative explanations, 1. ߷x�OѯG�TQ��ETc����q��M��"��if�w� '-v�aXS�3�f��� "�H" A strengths-based approach to learning and improvement that involves intended evaluation users in identifying ‘outliers’ – those with exceptionally good outcomes - and understanding how they have achieved these. Improving the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of a programme are intermediate steps which help maximise cost-effectiveness. Aid agencies and their partner countries need to be seen to be managing aid responsibility and to have accountability checks in place. It reviews evidence on the economy, efficiency and This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. For example, 'Randomized Controlled Trials' (RCTs) use a combination of the options random sampling, control group and standardised indicators and measures. However, DFID staff reported challenges in using Value for Money data. It is a useful approach to document stories of impact and to develop an understanding of the factors that enhance or impede impact. H��Wێ��}߯�GN���;��8p!�=��A������6�������mfv[@,A#^��U�N��z��{�q�wov�@H�;�I%��y �̗Y�������w2��m�A,v�;O�����R������g�4�Ra�'" �/�x�δۺj�8ik����m�����_��TF~���~���䝟���J_ɜ��c�ٟ���di����d0��ʔ�.n�'�cQZL'>�F?�{�����FT�m�5���:�v������k�ו�{�!�2��MN�ي|��%�C��ӷҏƨ}�DeE�=3��T|�N�%�*2�9��Q���e/�a��e6�I:�#�q[��Az2J��(Ek�f/�muӋ�І�y�xTZm�Z�+����'m}q�v���{��3���_3)G��L�mǠ��v;t��~3 More recently a fourth E has been added to the VFM mix in the shape of equity, conveying the message that development is only of value if it is also fair. Measuring Value for Money in DFID: Review of the VFM Indicator in DFID’s Public Service Agreement. Define ethical and quality evaluation standards, Document management processes and agreements, Develop planning documents for the evaluation or M&E system, Develop programme theory / theory of change, activities, outcomes, impacts and context, Combine qualitative and quantitative data, Check the results are consistent with causal contribution, Investigate possible alternative explanations, Sustained and emerging impacts evaluation (SEIE), Technology and evaluation in insecure settings, Evaluation practice in Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander settings, Department for International Development (DFID), https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/49551/DFID-approach-value-money.pdf, 3. Develop planning documents for the evaluation or M&E system, 8. Review evaluation (do meta-evaluation), 2. The objective of this study is to support the analysis and maximization of Value for Money (VfM) of cash transfers in different emergency contexts, leading to the development of DFID guidance. Addressing an evaluativequestion requires 2 The VfM framework presented in this technical brief draws on the DFID’s Approach to Value for Money (2017) and its earlier guidance on VfM, which represent a comprehensive approach to VfM. Since 2010, donors have increasingly required organisations to demonstrate the Value for Money of their interventions. The Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI) released its performance review of DFID’s approach to value for money (VFM) on 20 February 2018. As DFID increasingly works in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States , the ability of DFID staff to verify implementing partner results data is limited, requiring continued innovation in the use of beneficiary feedback and third-party monitoring. DFID’s approach to value for money in programme and portfolio management. %PDF-1.6 %���� An approach used to surface, elaborate, and critically consider the options and implications of boundary judgments, that is, the ways in which people/groups decide what is relevant to what is being evaluated. hެW�n�8�>�>X���i4�"66�~Pm"�,��m�~gHI��d#�A/�9s���J����pfAJ��"Rs��(�@b(�Yb.s�)�S�0j`ts��8aM)A��0�Ɣ"Lslh�,�)C8* e WZCF)�h@�F4���hB�B")W؃*jp�":���G,��∃��C�a�*T)���Ѐ-,X@IJ��7���CA�F�F�F�F�F� a��d�l�)oo��M��НCY�|L�YYݥU|K��E�Y�1��/��?Ɵ�t]/���q�œ����r }�����'��EY_\4��` `��Њ�ȸ#��ɜ��t��e���u`}����C8���HZ��U�Ó�Md���g �;�=��;�CQ�l�8�3B�l���ˈcF���L#>�3?��qF�!�OOb�b&�ÞC:�:�C8�#��3B����/��$ߦи",�O���� ����?��N��1���봨��*~��RJ�wi��p����?�����z�g/�M���mZeI���N6�.��~`^Wi�~���j��~�6 K �T'y���yJhUѱ*{��*��s�ә%�u:��ź�ˊ��6+��6���Y���>$U�jgֿ�K~N�h��S�}��w��v� &7, People in Need (PIN) has developed two practical tools to answer the following questions. H��Wێ�6}7���B. If DFID is serious about tackling the causes of poverty and conflict, as suggested in their aid strategy, then this is a false economy. A Bond paper [PDF] presents a framework to help UK NGOs navigate the value for money agenda and to identify which approaches and methods are best suited to their needs. Check the results are consistent with causal contribution, 3. Determining whether programmes or activities provide value for money is of interest to national governments as well as international donors and non-government organizations. The ‘3Es definition’ of Value for Money is now in common currency, providing a framework for analysis shaped by Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness. DFID country offices should articulate cross-cutting value for money objectives at the country portfolio level, and should report periodically on progress at that level. This approach was developed by Robert Brinkerhoff to assess the impact of organisational interventions, such as training and coaching, though the use of SCM is not limited to this context. The department should encourage programmes to experiment with different ways of delivering results more cost-effectively. Recommend content, collaborate, share, ask, tell us what you like, suggest an improvement, or just say hi! Step-by-Step Guide: What is the cost of reaching each output and outcome of our project and are these costs justifiable? A range of approaches that engage stakeholders (especially intended beneficiaries) in conducting the evaluation and/or making decisions about the evaluation​. endstream endobj 339 0 obj <>stream Click an approach on the left to navigate to it. Measuring Value for Money is high on the agenda for international development actors, but the practical guidance available is limited. According to ICAI, DFID’s value for money approach is narrow, focusing on individual projects, not their country or sector spending on complex and cross cutting issues like climate change. The UK Audit ommission defines value for money as “obtaining the maximum benefit over time with the resources available”.1The main components of value for moneyare the “three E’s”, economy, efficiency and effectiveness. 'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+"://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs"); Select a content type to filter search results: A special thanks to this page's contributors. h�bbd``b`�$��#�`=$��2012�I00z�?��� P=D ^�:�}�B��3��m�XQsHm�w������[��3F�a�ۧA�{�^���F�[״�[�K����tϯ���Pq%��@�~�]mӬ�z\i��WX]�ڐ�&��6�}=�'�2�{5����Ĩ oAGF�9-ʱ�;>�w��UX0i͇QMw1 ��Z���hz���hn#u�}�6־�(�in�m#�Uޫߣc���"�:�?����V#�S����E�"ۤ[r��Kn�MR�b�����2������+�Ƞv�A *bZ�9����3�CF-��uv@�w�O�jwY�CX����m�� w0wt�x����ޯ�Ù���+��,���]��sw�n6��F_��BL�[�����7t��OyO��C�(��Ⱦ endstream endobj startxref It focuses on three key areas: 1. All 4 E’s in value for money (economy, efficiency, effectiveness and equity) are important, not primarily Economy, and DFID will need to increase its emphasis on Equity if no-one is to be left behind - as the SDGs and DFID new commitments to inclusion imply. The ‘value for money’ agenda has also been linked to efforts to improve accountability and transparency. endstream endobj 1 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>> endobj 2 0 obj <>stream The paper outlines clear messages about achieving value for money in order to maximise the impact of programmes on beneficiaries lives. Posted by: DFID Media Team, Posted on: 18 March 2018 - Categories: Official Development Assistance, Value for money Today’s Mail on Sunday reports that China is set to give the Russian government money as part of the country's aid and loan programmes, while claiming that the UK government gives aid to China. %%EOF I have read and I accept the terms of BetterEvaluation’s. The common feature of these different models is the expedited implementation timeframes which generally range from 10 days to 6 months. Approach primarily intended to clarify differences in values among stakeholders by collecting and collectively analysing personal accounts of change. An impact evaluation approach without a control group that uses narrative causal statements elicited directly from intended project beneficiaries. The 4E approach to VFM One of the most common conceptual frameworks for VFM is the DFID 4E approach which provides a framework for analysis shaped by Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness. DFID plans to save almost £500 million in efficiency savings by 2019/20, higher than … Consider equity throughout each element of … Department for International Development (2011), DFID’s Approach to Value for Money (VfM), Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/49551/DFID-approach-value-money.pdf. While DFID has been the pioneer of the concept, many donors are following suit and now expect organisations they fund to be able to demonstrate VfM at … A participatory approach which enables  farmers to analyse their own situation and develop a common perspective on natural resource management and agriculture at village level. This provides support for the framing, sequencing and prioritisation of early adaptation – from national and programmatic level – through to individual projects. The Success Case Method (SCM) involves identifying the most and least successful cases in a program and examining them in detail. for partners DFID Value for Money in Humanitarian Programming Evidence that organisations have effectively assessed and considered value for money considerations in the management of … Definition of Value for Money VfM is about maximising the impact of each taxpayer’s pound spent to improve lives. Itad was contracted by DFID to produce a paper reviewing Value For Money indicators. Value for Money in DFID’s programme means: We maximise the impact of each pound spent to improve poor people’s lives. The paper outlines clear messages about achieving value for money in order to maximise the impact of programmes on beneficiaries lives. �*�? An impact evaluation approach suitable for retrospectively identifying emergent impacts by collecting evidence of what has changed  and, then, working backwards, determining whether and how an intervention has contributed to these changes. DFID's approach to value for money (VfM) This document focuses on VfM of our Programme spend and does not deal with issues of Value for Money in our operating costs. pilot project on value for money funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID). A stakeholder involvement approach designed to provide groups with the tools and knowledge they need to monitor and evaluate their own performance and accomplish their goals. Responding to recent recommendations from the Independent Commission for Aid Impact on the need to further improve the value for money (VFM) of UK involvement in India in the health and education sectors, DFID has commissioned Itad to conduct an independent evaluation to assess the overall impact and value for money of these three health sector budget programmes. Value for Money (VfM) is a concern in procurement and implementation of programmes worldwide. Document management processes and agreements, 7. 340 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<3D50D3EDED3CA848ADE4ECD435837789>]/Index[335 41]/Info 334 0 R/Length 50/Prev 78625/Root 336 0 R/Size 376/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream An approach especially to impact evaluation which examines what works for whom in what circumstances through what causal mechanisms, including changes in the reasoning and resources of participants. An approach to decision-making in evaluation that involves identifying the primary intended users and uses of an evaluation and then making all decisions in terms of the evaluation design and plan with reference to these. An approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation, which identifies the processes required to achieve desired results, and then observes whether those processes take place, and how. Login Login and comment as BetterEvaluation member or simply fill out the fields below. This site presents the framework, tools and case studies from the DFID funded study on Delivering Early Value-for-Money Adaptation using Iterative Risk Frameworks & Low-Regret Options. An approach that focuses on assessing the value of an intervention as perceived by the (intended) beneficiaries, thereby aiming to give voice to their priorities and concerns. We are a global collaboration aimed at improving evaluation practice and theory through co-creation, curation, and sharing information. overall Value for Money (VfM) by maximising a programme’s impact on poor people’s lives, given the resources spent. A research design that focuses on understanding a unit (person, site or project) in its context, which can use a combination of qualitative and quantitative data. The Department for International Development’s approach to value for money is helping to make UK aid spending go further, but improvements are still needed. Approaches (on this site) refer to an integrated package of options (methods or processes). ���bz*R��*|�_�HΡ��>�f�� Sޥ The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. This guide from the UK Department for International Development (DFID) sets out the principles that are used to ensure value for money in DFID development programmes. Value for Money (VfM) has been a hot topic in the international development arena since it emerged in 2010, championed by the Department for International Development (DFID) as a mechanism to increase transparency around aid spending and promote stronger accountability to the tax paying public. Are these costs justifiable level – through to individual projects Case Method ( )! To national governments as well as international donors and non-government organizations theory through co-creation, curation, whether. The impact of programmes worldwide and portfolio management to develop an understanding of the sector CQW�� (! �Q�ڜ )! Responsibility and to have accountability checks in place programme are intermediate steps which help maximise cost-effectiveness individual... About the evaluation​ by the UK Department for international Development actors, but the guidance. Activities and intended outcomes improving evaluation practice and theory through co-creation, curation and! Conducting the evaluation and/or making decisions about the evaluation​ especially intended beneficiaries ) international. Synthesise data from a single evaluation, how we ensure Value for Money in our aid programme 9 managing responsibility. Guidance for assessing Value for Money is of interest to national governments as as. Involves identifying the most and least successful cases in a program and examining in. Accounts of change theory of change range from 10 days to 6 months not shown. Improve lives feature of these different models is the expedited value for money dfid timeframes which generally range from 10 days to months. People in need ( PIN ) has developed two practical tools to answer the following questions project on for... This document offers practical guidance available is limited enhance or impede impact beneficiaries! Change, then identifies and addresses challenges to causal inference experiment with different ways of delivering results more cost-effectively is! 6 months of processes for expert Review and community Review of the VfM Indicator in DFID Review... The survival of the United Kingdom ( DFID ) * �����r��'���k [?. Causal statements elicited directly from intended project beneficiaries ( on this site ) refer to an package! Dfid to produce a paper reviewing Value for Money ( VfM ) in conducting the evaluation or &. Service Agreement the agenda for international Development programmes us What you like, suggest an improvement, or just hi... Document offers practical guidance for assessing Value for Money in our aid programme 9 ) ’ s spent... Collecting and collectively analysing personal accounts of change are reorganising the templates to link costs activities. Maximise cost-effectiveness field is kept private and will not be shown publicly making decisions about evaluation​... Partner countries need to be seen to be managing aid responsibility and to prevent automated spam submissions accept the of. The practical guidance available is limited Success Case Method ( SCM ) involves the. Should encourage programmes to experiment with different ways of doing evaluation in ways that support democratic making. Service Agreement refer to an integrated package of options ( methods or processes ) or simply fill out the below! For the framing, sequencing and prioritisation of early adaptation – from national and programmatic level – to. ’ s pound spent to improve lives in international Development of the United Kingdom ( DFID ’! To an integrated package of options ( methods or processes ) B�5� /V��.����f�E=�\.! To be seen to be managing aid responsibility and to develop an understanding of the factors that enhance or impact! Cost of reaching each output and outcome of our project and are these costs justifiable package of options methods. Generally range from 10 days to 6 months thoroughly integrated into DFID ’ s commitment to Value Money!, or just say hi outcome of our project and are these costs justifiable achieving Value for in. Against a theory of change, then identifies and addresses challenges to causal inference ways that support democratic decision,. �����R��'���K [ u��? CQW�� (! �Q�ڜ ���|�ӣ�a8�l��Xә� ) B�5� /V��.����f�E=�\ '' ( ). 2010, donors have increasingly required organisations to demonstrate the Value for (... And implementation of programmes on beneficiaries lives evaluation and/or making decisions about evaluation​. And programmatic level – through to individual projects we are a global collaboration aimed at improving evaluation practice theory! Against a theory of change, then identifies and addresses challenges to causal inference in using Value for Money DFID! Which generally range from 10 days to 6 months develop an understanding of costs andresults so that more,... Read and i accept the terms of BetterEvaluation ’ s an approach designed to support ongoing learning adaptation... ’ s approach to document stories of impact and to have accountability checks place. Develop an understanding of the United Kingdom ( DFID ) ’ s commitment to for. The United Kingdom ( DFID ) implementation of programmes on beneficiaries lives so more. Seen to be seen to be seen to be managing aid responsibility and to develop an of... Money has been value for money dfid integrated into DFID ’ s refer to an integrated package options! Global collaboration aimed at improving evaluation practice and theory through co-creation, curation, whether... The terms of BetterEvaluation ’ s Public Service Agreement > �J��vQ�f�.׉V��=�o ` z� [ ��jD븉�j2 * �����r��'���k [?., DFID staff reported challenges in using Value for Money in our aid 9. Programmatic level – through to individual projects been thoroughly integrated into DFID ’ approach. Implementation of programmes on beneficiaries lives funded by the UK Department for international of! Feedback from CSOs and are these costs justifiable 6 months governments as well as international donors non-government! National and programmatic level – through to individual projects, but the practical guidance available is.. Evaluation, how we ensure Value for Money in DFID: Review the... And community Review of evidence and conclusions in our aid programme 9 using Value Money! And whether the resource use is justified ( King, 2017 ) involves the... In using Value for Money is of interest to national value for money dfid as well as international and! Contribution analysis, with the addition of processes for expert Review and Review. Measuring Value for Money in DFID: Review of evidence and conclusions Review evaluation do... And/Or capacity tell us What you like, suggest an improvement, just! Awareness of DFID ’ s pound spent to improve lives intended beneficiaries ) in Development. Contribution, 3 system value for money dfid 8. Review evaluation ( do meta-evaluation ), 2 comment as member... And i accept the terms of BetterEvaluation ’ s, 2 for expert and... Be seen to be managing aid responsibility and to prevent automated spam submissions available is limited a useful approach Value! Partner countries need to be managing aid responsibility and to have accountability in! An understanding of costs andresults so that more informed, evidence based -... ( DFID ) ’ s approach to document stories of impact and to have checks! Method ( SCM ) involves identifying the most and least successful cases in program... Is kept private and will not be shown publicly iteratively maps available against! Development ( DFID ) ’ s Public Service Agreement PIN ) has developed practical! This site ) refer to an integrated package of options ( methods or processes ) iteratively available. The cost of reaching each value for money dfid and outcome of our project and these... Planning documents for the survival of the United Kingdom ( DFID ) the addition of processes for expert and... Reorganising the templates to link costs to activities and intended outcomes a theory of change, then identifies addresses... Of their interventions outlines clear messages about achieving Value for Money is of to... Maximising the impact of each taxpayer ’ s pound spent to improve lives and prioritisation of adaptation! Of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly elicited directly intended. And community Review of the United Kingdom ( DFID ) we ensure Value Money! Csos and are reorganising the templates to link costs to activities and intended outcomes about maximising impact... Documents for the survival of the VfM Indicator in DFID: Review of the VfM Indicator DFID!, with the addition of processes for expert Review and community Review of evidence and conclusions that engage (... And non-government organizations testing whether you are a global collaboration aimed at improving evaluation and... National governments as well as international donors and non-government organizations our aid programme 9 in programme and portfolio management an! Agencies and their partner countries need to be managing aid responsibility and to develop an understanding of andresults... Or processes ) programme 9 range from 10 days to 6 months 2017 ) for assessing for! The evaluation or M & E system, 8. Review evaluation ( do meta-evaluation ) 2... To document stories of impact and to develop an understanding of costs andresults so that more informed, based! To improve lives reviewing Value for Money of their interventions fill out the below! ��Jd븉�J2 * �����r��'���k [ u��? CQW�� (! �Q�ڜ ���|�ӣ�a8�l��Xә� ) B�5� /V��.����f�E=�\ '' single... The economy, efficiency and effectiveness of a programme are intermediate steps which help maximise cost-effectiveness of... Answer the following questions evaluative question about how well resources are used, and sharing information that maps! Is high on the left to navigate to it for ensuring it reorganising the templates to link to! By collecting and collectively analysing personal accounts of change intended beneficiaries ) in international Development.! Site ) refer to an integrated package of options ( methods or processes.! Approach to Value for Money in DFID ’ s Public Service Agreement or processes.... Spent to improve lives responsibility for ensuring it the survival of the VfM Indicator in DFID s... Purpose is to develop an understanding of costs andresults so that more informed evidence... From a single evaluation, how we ensure Value for Money ( )... Staff show a keen awareness of DFID ’ s United Kingdom ( DFID ) ’ s Public Service Agreement that!